On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Jay Daley
<jay@nzrs.net.nz> wrote:
On 24/04/2009, at 2:35 PM, Dave Mill wrote:
> -Unbound seems rather nice. Simple to set-up, simple configuration,
> and supports so many things out of the box. Seems to have a rather
> nice forked operation mode which I'm currently testing.
>
> So, take the plunge and do the split. And if you're unhappy with bind
> (I was) try unbound as an alternative.
I would go even further and suggest everyone use unbound in preference
to any other caching resolver. �It is extremely well designed, coded,
tested and supported. �I'm sure BIND10 will be as well but for now, as
is natural, BIND9 has been leap-frogged by the more recently released
product.
Jay