13 Jun
2006
13 Jun
'06
1:50 p.m.
bryan wrote:
Given the packet loss and latency at that hop, wireless seems a likely candidate.
Oh dear lord, ok I *was* going to leave this post alone, but sorry, I took the bait. I'm dumbfounded as to who made the executive decision that wireless == lag ? /me blames Woooooooooosh Newsflash: not all wireless technologies are "laggy" and in fact a lot are really damn good, latency wise. Congestion/rate limiting, who knows. (I shall now leave this thread alone so as not to inflict the wrath of t3h_d0n4ld) -Richard