Quicksilver's domestic traffic makes up about a 3rd of its total traffic, which is probably not that different from other ISPs. It doesn't appear to change the average persons behaviour. People don't tend to visit trademe any more or any less just because it doesn't count towards their datacap, and most of the peer to peer traffic comes from offshore.
From an average customer perspective, it just means that their effective datacap is 25% higher with Quicksilver than other ISPs. e.g. a QSI customer on a 10GB international plan will on average have downloaded 13.3GB (domestic and international) before their international speed is throttled.
Mark -----Original Message----- From: Simon Allard [mailto:simon.allard(a)staff.ihug.co.nz] Sent: Thursday, 27 April 2006 4:39 p.m. To: nznog(a)list.waikato.ac.nz Subject: Re: [nznog] QSI / "industry" DSL problems caused by3.5mbit upgrades?
With this service limitation I can easily see how Quicksilver could potentially be affected more than Ihug, Iconz, Xtra and Orcon. I would guess that the average user profile on Quicksilver would tend towards higher bandwidth usage whereas the typical Xtra (etc) user would probably use less bandwidth.
Unfortunately if this view I have is correct then I don't see an end to problems unless either the average Quicksilver user profile changes -or- Telecom changes the PVC limitation.
I am curious to know what effect offering free national traffic has on the QSI DSL Network. In my experience offering free anything in this environment Telecom has created causes nothing by problems. _______________________________________________ NZNOG mailing list NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.5.0/325 - Release Date: 26/04/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.5.0/325 - Release Date: 26/04/2006