and if I paid more I would get more reliability? Using the same infrastructure for expensive (read reliable) and cheap (read cheerful) I don't see that cost=reliable at all. Cheers Wayne -----Original Message----- From: David Robb [mailto:ender(a)paradise.gen.nz] Sent: Thursday, 21 December 2006 11:30 To: Simon Allard Cc: nznog(a)list.waikato.ac.nz Subject: Re: [nznog] Telstra's Outage On Thu, 21 Dec 2006, Simon Allard wrote:
You can't expect good uptimes and run your business which requires high availability internet on a $39.95 DSL account.
Good, Fast, Cheap. Pick any two. (It's even in RFC 1925). --David _______________________________________________ NZNOG mailing list NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog This communication, including any attachments, is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not read it - please contact me immediately, destroy it, and do not copy or use any part of this communication or disclose anything about it. Thank you. Please note that this communication does not designate an information system for the purposes of the Electronic Transactions Act 2002.