Probably so, though this thread artificially skews the results. -Adam // Lurking from outside of New York /// if my .02c is at all welcomed, kudos to the nznog archive maintainers for not removing messages, it was sad when nanog did //// even sadder, most of the conversation devolved the fact that the merit maintainer had sent HTML mail, virtually no substantive discussion on what had actually occurred was conducted :/ On Dec 3, 2006, at 3:01 AM, Mike wrote:
I bet there is a high lurker to participant ratio...
Mike (lurking in Seattle, WA, USA at the moment)
On Dec 2, 2006, at 11:11 PM, Jamie Baddeley wrote:
On Sun, 2006-12-03 at 19:47 +1300, Dean Pemberton wrote:
The membership list has grown now to include more than a few 'interested parties' and even journalists.
Out of interest, could the list_admins let us know what the current subscriber count on the list is?
cheers
jamie
_______________________________________________ NZNOG mailing list NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog
_______________________________________________ NZNOG mailing list NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog