Chris Wedgwood wrote:
As seen on the worlds greatest 'Stupidity Amplifier'; slashdot:
(...which a significant number of people read on a daily basis, of which just a small handful use as their morning intelligence test to start the day or pass the time... new age crossword puzzle?). In any case, the problem isn't the punters (that background radiation exists *everywhere*, it is the folks that edit/moderate that particular insane asylum What strikes me as slightly odd is that most people who say they want to multihome for "fault tolerance/redundancy purposes" will reveal to you, under intense questioning, that what they *actually* want to do is load balancing. Whatever the case solutions exist without having to pull your hair out dealing with your upstream/NIC: http://www.radware.com/content/products/link.htm Which only leaves the following question: Does anyone have a definitive (at this particular point in time) list of all protocols/applications that embed layer2/3 address information in the payload? Other alternatives include closely coupling DHCPS/RADIUS/etc. to NAT, but I don't believe anyone has actually written code for that yet (for good and proper reasons). - To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog