On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Simon Green�
<simon@simongreen.net>�wrote:
On 30 May 2012 13:25, Nicholas Lee <
emptysands@gmail.com> wrote:
> In the case of a dispute, it would be better to allow the domain holder with
> the longest third level�registration�to have priority for the second level.
Why? That doesn't seem fair.
What's fair got to do with�a domain holder who has been paying for a domain for 10+ years - thus contributing to the domain infrastructure for that period - have less rights than someone who has only had a domain for 1 year?
Here is a�personal�example:
domain_dateregistered: 1998-02-17T00:00:00+13:00
domain_dateregistered: 2011-07-05T20:57:01+12:00
and an example that goes the other way:
domain_dateregistered: 2001-01-16T15:21:12+13:00
nic@vpn:~$ whois
ii.co.nz | grep datereg
domain_dateregistered: 1999-10-20T00:00:00+13:00
Whatever the case, *.
co.nz will likely be keep by most existing holders. Shifting email domains is much harder than web pages. Overall I less�positives�in this based on increased costs vs a system that has worked thus far.
Nicholas