Presumably a redundant link means that nobody loses service when they accidentally break one of them?

It does seem like an excuse to blame National for not propping up Pacific Fibre, rather than anything wrong with a redundant set of links failing over correctly due to a fault, as designed

Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 9, 2012, at 1:20 PM, Al Twohill <moebiusproject@gmail.com> wrote:

On 9 November 2012 15:16, David Robinson <nznog@karit.geek.nz> wrote:
http://computerworld.co.nz/news.nsf/news/labour-alleges-failure-of-southern-cross-cable

How much substance and how much Political Grandstanding? Yes a second
cable would be nice but be careful saying the sky is falling.

There is a thread discussing it on AUSNOG. Looks like Labour basically quoted that.

http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/2012-November/015297.html�

_______________________________________________
NZNOG mailing list
NZNOG@list.waikato.ac.nz
http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog