I think the board of directors will flip, and tell you to find a solution, as not growing the business will not be considered an
The whole world doesn't have to instantly change to IPv6 - they it does need to start running dual stacks now (IPv4 and IPv6), so that in 3 to 6 years (and that is the only time frame debated in this thread) it wont be so harsh when IPv4 stops becoming available for new customers. -----Original Message----- From: Robert Gray [mailto:bob(a)brockhurst.co.nz] Sent: Wednesday, 29 November 2006 8:12 a.m. To: nznog(a)list.waikato.ac.nz Subject: Re: [nznog] IPv4 Exhaustion Philip D'Ath wrote: option.
Now you'll find that you'll be suddenly rolling out IPv6 real fast as the cost to not do it will be extreme.
I'd check that the board were happy that your customers won't be able to host web sites or email servers that can be seen in v4 space or even run p2p apps with v4 customers. When I looked at v6 some 10 years ago (I bought a book) it seemed to me that the world all had to change together and that's not a cutover I can see working too well. Is v6 really the best/only solution to v4 exhaustion? -- Robert Gray _______________________________________________ NZNOG mailing list NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog