31 Jan
2006
31 Jan
'06
6:30 a.m.
Paul Adshead wrote:
The legal stuff on their site says something like "you are not supposed to block access based on information on this site", yet that is exactly why their site has been created. That's their legal 'get out' to avoid all liability.
Not really. That's perfectly valid. Blacklist sites like SORBS should probably not be used except as one factor in a weighting system such as spamassassin. I know many people do, and sometimes when the spam is flowing like an open sewer, it's very tempting... That doesn't really invalidate SORBS' statement though. Note: I'm not defending SORBS here, I just happen to agree with that particular statement on their website. Regards, Greig McGill