At 15:22 23/05/2001, David Anso wrote:
After having a rather large and ever increasing number of customers complaining to us about increased traffic bills due to telecoms lack of peering, we have started down the road of "Lets simply block all telecom connected customer IP's at our International Border router" most of our customers so far have been agreeable to this strategy and I am wondering what the effect would be if everyone that peered at APE were to take a similar stance.
Sounds like a good idea to me, but isn't there some rules against this sort of action for members of ISOCNZ? Thou shalt not block traffic to resolve disputes or somethign similar.
Or does that not apply here? :-)
who said anyone was blocking traffic ? all you are doing is stopping national traffic from flowing over your international link - I wasn't suggesting that we simply cut telecom off, just that we ask that they send their traffic over the mutually agreed peering points. -- Steve. -- Steve Phillips, Systems Admin, Asia Online NZ Ltd -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GIT/CS/CC d- s+:- a- C++++(---)$ UL++++$ UB++++$ US++++$ UC++++$ P+ L+++$ E- W-(+) N+$ w$ O V PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP++ t+@ 5+++ tv++ b+ G e+>* h r--- z+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ To decode see http://www.ebb.org/ungeek/ --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog