I did say disagree with the "spam" method used.
 
I agree this thread is a waste of time and should die.
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Gordon Smith [mailto:gordon@morenet.net.nz]
Sent: Thursday, 3 July 2003 3:47 p.m.
To: Richard Parkinson; nznog@list.waikato.ac.nz
Subject: RE: [nznog] APE Peering

Richard,

Was there any point to that message at all?

Firstly, spam is spam, not "distributed" email. It is unsolicited
commercial email, which this was.

Secondly, I think you'll find that ANY provider that has previously
behaved as poorly would attract a similar response.
I really don't care if they are mystical or deformed, this is a breach
of what is generally accepted as "acceptable conduct".

Perhaps this thread should die - it has very little to do with network
operations.


Gordon Smith  CCNA
Network Operations Manager

MoreNet Ltd

PGP Fingerprint: 4B12 FBE4 784A 3294 6637 4587 AB6F C893 AB2C 952C