If only there were some RFCs for how to deploy route servers at exchange points.....


http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7947.txt
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7948.txt


:)

On Wednesday, 7 September 2016, Don Stokes <don@daedalus.co.nz> wrote:
Hi Tim, Sid,

So can we clarify ... if Site A is "opt out" (i.e. old and busted behaviour, IX ASN inserted) and site B is "opt in" (new hotness behaviour, IX ASN not inserted):
  • Would Site A see the IX ASN inserted in routes announced to the route servers by Site B?
  • Would Site B see the IX ASN inserted in routes announced to the route servers by Site A?
That is, is the ASN inserted into a route's AS path based on where the route comes from, or where it's announced to? Is there more than one setting?

-- don