15 Apr
2003
15 Apr
'03
6:59 a.m.
I was not suggesting it as an option, it was meerly to point out that giving a v6 address in place of a v4 address is just as bad, if not worse. Nathan Ward Zanetti David wrote:
Nathan Ward wrote on 16 April 2003:
In that case RFC1918 space can be used... else beware the whining gamer who can't play CounterStrike with a v6 address.
Please let us not head down the path of handing out RFC1918 space to end users as if this is a real connection. That way leads to Much Pain with Less Than Friendly Protocols. Which seems to be an awful lot beyond CS weenies :)
The day an ISP hands me an address which is RFC1918 is the day I switch away.