Anton Smith wrote:
Perhaps we don't need anything so formal, but maybe a peering mailing list for our IXs would be a good start. Or should we just use NZNOG?
I think that NZNOG has always fulfilled the role for those that require it; perhaps in conjunction with the published contact details for each IX participant. I don't see a need for (another) mailing list(s) for people to monitor for something that is reasonably static. NZ and the IXes here are nowhere near the size of LINX or AMS-IX, participant wise or geographic coverage wise, and don't have the participant flux that those exchanges have. As for tracking missed traffic? I used to run Mk. I eyeball over my domestic prefix view once a month or so; and manage prefix lists accordingly. [remember: new entries to the NZIX RADB are sent to NZNOG...] aj.