31 Jul
2012
31 Jul
'12
12:19 p.m.
On 01/08/2012, at 3:15 PM, Joel Wirāmu Pauling wrote:
On 1 August 2012 17:11, David Robinson
wrote: Each hop adds time and well PacFibre was using direct pipe as lower latency than SC.
Sure, but the TBD to the US still would have been a bitch for a lot of applications, the numbers I had seen bandied about were around the 70ms mark best case. Which isn't that much better to the 130ms of the existing paths.
I think the proposed path by PF was potentially a few ms (~5-8ms) faster than the existing cable. -- James