On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 07:08:54PM +1300, Andy Linton wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Keith Davidson wrote:
If you can advise how consultation could occur within that kind of time frame, please advise how?
If you think InternetNZ should have done nothing due to the tight time frame and inability therefore to consult, then say so.
But please don't make spurious allegations about secrecy!
I'm simply talking about the fact that the InternetNZ position on this is only visible to members. Why can't it be public? Why can't most of InternetNZ's web site be public given the decision at the AGM to adopt a policy of openness wherever possible? What can InternetNZ have said about this issue that can't be in the public arena?
Please, stop the madness! NZNOG has already plunged to hideous depths of noise over signal; dragging isocnz-roasting into the mix cannot, possibly, make things any better. Joe - To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog