Disclaimer: I worked for CityLink a while back so feel free to consider the following biased or well informed as you see fit :)
I think one aspect of this discussion that is often overlooked is who participates in the peering exchanges. It's not just a handful of large ISP's and content providers.
Take a look at:
We have a huge range of participants: universities, schools, government, data centres, finance, researchers, broadcasters, etc. Very few of these organisations operate networks as their core business.
If it's so important to convince them all to opt-in to the change what are we doing to explain why they should make that change? Pointing at an RFC and yelling loudly hardly seems likely to be accepted as a convincing argument outside of the networking community.��
Personally, I think the approach CityLink is taking seems entirely reasonable.��
I would be keen to have regular updates from CityLink regarding the amount of uptake and any issues encountered by those making the change that might help others considering it.
Thanks,
Dylan