As an ISP'll end up with collisions with their customers if RFC1918 space is used for their intermediary/ISP portion of NAT444, a new /10 (specifically 100.64.0.0/10) was allocated for this use. RFC6598 details the allocation, and the use cases for it.

-- 
Neil Fenemor | 
+64 21 978 078 | Facetime | Skype


On 27 February 2014 at 12:00:57 pm, Dave Mill (davemill@gmail.com) wrote:

As a slightly more serious reply (though Mike's URL did work surprisingly well..) I would assume we are going to see more and more RFC1918 addresses used by ISPs as IPv4 runs out and CGN is used more.

I'm aware of at least 3 ISPs in NZ doing this (we're one of them to some extent with a couple of our prepay products) and I'd expect there are more.

Cheers
Dave



On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Mike Cooper <mikec.cooper@gmail.com> wrote:


On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Matt Grant <matt@mattgrant.net.nz> wrote:

Hi!

Know I am some small fry on the list, but your help would be
appreciated.

This would be useful in talking to my ISP about some PMTU issues that I
am having re a VPN going over PPPoE, with MTU 1480.

Thanks!

Matt Grant


_______________________________________________
NZNOG mailing list
NZNOG@list.waikato.ac.nz
http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog


_______________________________________________
NZNOG mailing list
NZNOG@list.waikato.ac.nz
http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog


_______________________________________________
NZNOG mailing list
NZNOG@list.waikato.ac.nz
http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog