On 2011-09-02 09:20, Sam Sargeant wrote:
On 2/09/2011, at 9:07 AM, Paul Brislen wrote:
I don't know if the tribunal would be able to understand the argument from a technical point of view but yes, you'll need to prove what you were doing at that specific time was legit.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Null_hypothesis
I don't believe anyone is going to be able to prove that. It will reduce down to "my word against yours"; in which case would the tribunal side with the account holder?
That's why it's a Bill of Rights issue that needs to be escalated to the Supreme Court. As Juha said, it will take someone with deep pockets, even if the alleged infringer is a pauper. I'm afraid this is out of scope for an operational list, so I will shut up now. Brian