On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 10:07 +1300, Peter Mott wrote:
On 30/11/2006, at 9:49 AM, David Zanetti wrote:
This seems to be a bit of a storm in a teacup. By all means, people should play with it. But demanding a transition when it makes no economic sense to do so right now is just bad business.
Acting early when you have the benefit of time is often less costly than acting when you are forced to do so with limited time. Makes economic sense to me.
Of course, I didn't say "no no, IPv6 mustn't be touched at all", by all
means play with it, run tunnels, labs, etc.
I just don't see anything today I would bother demanding native v6
transit for. So long as that't the case, I can live with tunnels for the
lab/play phase of things.
--
David Zanetti