Except for where resiliency was down due to previously scheduled maintenance�� Certainly wasn�t seamless from my point of view.� But yes, Clare Curran needs to GTFO
�
From: nznog-bounces@list.waikato.ac.nz [mailto:nznog-bounces@list.waikato.ac.nz] On Behalf Of Sam Russell
Sent: Friday, 9 November 2012 3:27 p.m.
To: Al Twohill
Cc: nznog
Subject: Re: [nznog] Labour alleges failure of Southern Cross Cable�
Presumably a redundant link means that nobody loses service when they accidentally break one of them?
�
It does seem like an excuse to blame National for not propping up Pacific Fibre, rather than anything wrong with a redundant set of links failing over correctly due to a fault, as designed
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 9, 2012, at 1:20 PM, Al Twohill <moebiusproject@gmail.com> wrote:�
On 9 November 2012 15:16, David Robinson <nznog@karit.geek.nz> wrote:
http://computerworld.co.nz/news.nsf/news/labour-alleges-failure-of-southern-cross-cable
How much substance and how much Political Grandstanding? Yes a second
cable would be nice but be careful saying the sky is falling.�
There is a thread discussing it on AUSNOG. Looks like Labour basically quoted that.
�
_______________________________________________
NZNOG mailing list
NZNOG@list.waikato.ac.nz
http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog