Re: [nznog] AS paths from NZIX route servers

Another nznog post after one has obviously had too many beers on a Friday night. Suggesting they RTFM… lE karl(a)mothership.co.nz mailto:karl(a)mothership.co.nz lW mothership.co.nz http://mothership.co.nz/ lA PO Box 99814, Newmarket lM 021 999 990 lP 974 3171

On 9/09/2016, at 8:32 PM, Dean Pemberton wrote:

If only there were some RFCs for how to deploy route servers at exchange points.....

http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7947.txt http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7947.txt http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7948.txt http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7948.txt

:)

On Wednesday, 7 September 2016, Don Stokes mailto:don(a)daedalus.co.nz> wrote: Hi Tim, Sid,

So can we clarify ... if Site A is "opt out" (i.e. old and busted behaviour, IX ASN inserted) and site B is "opt in" (new hotness behaviour, IX ASN not inserted): Would Site A see the IX ASN inserted in routes announced to the route servers by Site B? Would Site B see the IX ASN inserted in routes announced to the route servers by Site A? That is, is the ASN inserted into a route's AS path based on where the route comes from, or where it's announced to? Is there more than one setting?

-- don _______________________________________________ NZNOG mailing list NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz https://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog