On Tue, March 13, 2007 12:36, jamie baddeley wrote:
On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 12:29 +1300, Nathan Ward wrote: [cut]
or (b) a concern for connection oriented protocols (TCP).
Correct me if I'm wrong but this is only a concern under a failure mode of an anycast node? So combined with probability of risk and ease of resolution (browser reload), is this really a big concern?
TCP anycast works just fine (http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0606/levine.html)...it is FUD (spread by verislime and others) that it doesn't work. like ALL things network-related, you have to know what you are doing and understand the limitations... /joshua -- A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools. - Douglas Adams -