I would very much like to see this level of independent input from a volunteer team. Otherwise it really will bowl down to one person's word against the other.
Sent from my iPhone
On 2/09/2011, at 9:27 AM, "Jay Daley"
On 2/09/2011, at 9:07 AM, Paul Brislen wrote:
I don't know if the tribunal would be able to understand the argument from a technical point of view but yes, you'll need to prove what you were doing at that specific time was legit.
In my previous job I received many complaints from specialist contractors working on behalf of rights holders (relating to domain names not downloading) and they always demonstrated poor technical competency by those contractors.
I doubt this has improved and so it is likely that a thorough examination of the technical details of the complaint will turn up significant flaws in the way they complaint has been generated.
It would be useful if there were a volunteer team ready to conduct this examination that the first set of accused could call on. That way we might be able to discredit the methodology at an early stage.
Jay
-- Jay Daley Chief Executive .nz Registry Services (New Zealand Domain Name Registry Limited) desk: +64 4 931 6977 mobile: +64 21 678840