On Wed, 31 May 2000 16:21:55 +1200, Peter Mott wrote:
I see ISOCNZ council has thrown out the hine report because it strongly recommended the introduction of a shared registry model for .nz
Not true. The Hine report has generated considerable debate within council, and I know of several other papers that have been generated. The issue currently is "should the paper be adopted as is" or what changes/re-write might be appropriate.
Prof hine waltzes all over the country side, getting views from people who are interested, puts together a useful document and ISOCNZ council want it to be changed or re-written.
It would obviously have been easier and saved a lot of time if the WG had ignored all the public meetings and consultations and just come up with the recommendations that those who were not on the WG decided the WG should have. DPF ________________________________________________________________________ <david at farrar dot com> NZ Usenet FAQs - http://www.dpf.ac.nz/usenet/nz ICQ 29964527 --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog