Gerard Creamer wrote:
Hi all,
Through our own stupidity we were inadvertently blocking a recent allocation from APNIC and thought I'd mention it here.
We had a bogon list with 112.0.0.0/5 in it and misread it as /8 several times before growing a brain and sorting it out. Just thought I'd mention it so folks can recheck their bogon lists to ensure that the following aren't being stopped by a larger aggregation.
116/8 APNIC 117/8 APNIC 118/8 APNIC 119/8 APNIC 120/8 APNIC
One other thing to watch with these allocations is that while we're supposed to live in a classless IP world the Cisco auto-summary command sees these blocks as /8 allocations and it's use may cause confusion to those used to using IP blocks starting with numbers > 192. (:-) At least one ISP peering with the Exchanges has been caught - no auto-summary could be your friend here.