Because as time goes by people far less and less about this. If they try long enough then they will whittle the no votes down the the people who REALLY care, and then they just have to pay more bank employee's than that, and they get it in. Think like a big bank. You have to figure that the internet is not going away. .bank.nz will have it's uses in 2005 or 2010 just as much as it does today. So why not put in a new bid every year. It's a small part of the marketting budget, and eventually you'll get it in. They lost the first time because there was a big initial outcry. I bet this time they don't get half as many NO votes. Not because people are any happier with it, just because a lot of them don't care. I won't be voting, and I did the first time. Case in point. Andy - Where is the celt.nz proposal. THERE is one I'll vote for. Dean On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 10:17:06PM +1200, Lin Nah wrote:
I am glad others have followed up to this. I actually almost replied and deleted what I wrote
What do they think has changed this time? Do they think putting in a request over and over again that people will eventually vote for it? Or will they now try to have a concerted effort where people (such as bank employees) will be encouraged to vote for it?
This is a waste of time. I am surprised they didn't decide to go for the .bank TLD after failing on this .nz 2LD.
I would like to know if the anyone within the present ISOCNZ council supports this proposal. If yes, why. If no, why AND if there's a unanimous no, why is our time wasted by this RFD?
lin
- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog
- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog