19 Nov
2008
19 Nov
'08
11:46 a.m.
On 2008-11-18, at 22:49, Philip Seccombe wrote:
Just a quick thought, wouldn’t caching peer to peer end up being a massive cache full of illegal files and small amount are not worth caching
It's not clear to me why this would be different from running a news server or an HTTP cache, both of which have been done extensively over the years in NZ. The effectiveness of a cache (of any kind) depends to at least some extent on the design of the cache, surely. It seems premature to declare failure based on no data. Joe