For a small customer why not just build redundancy with your ISP? Eg 2x circuits with two different access providers, BGP with a private ASN to two different routers at the ISP side. Outages tend to affect a particular router/BRAS/access handover so by making that redundant you're achieving "pretty good" redundancy.
-Scott
Sent using OWA for iPhone
________________________________
From: nznog-bounces(a)list.waikato.ac.nz on behalf of Alexander Neilson
Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2013 12:22:04 p.m.
To: Matt Richards
Cc: NZNOG
Subject: Re: [nznog] Multi-homing without PI space
Not sure if I am correct here but if they are using a /28 now to comply with the APNIC rules as per the below they would need to show use for 25% now (a /26) and within one year using a /25 (50% of address space).
It may be that APNIC may let them be a bit fuzzy about the exact number “in use” but the rules would seem to exclude them as they would need to quadruple their use of IP Addressing /28 to /26 immediately.
Again - not an APNIC rules expert and I could be wrong here.
Regards
Alexander
Alexander Neilson
Neilson Productions Limited
alexander(a)neilson.net.nzmailto:alexander(a)neilson.net.nz
021 329 681
022 456 2326
On 6/11/2013, at 12:15 pm, Matt Richards mailto:matt(a)shakesbeare.com> wrote:
On 6/11/2013 11:30 a.m., Matthew Poole wrote:
A "small company wanting to play big company" question:
My employer is investigating options for network redundancy as having a functional internet connection is critical to our operation. We're not in any position to even try applying for PI IPv4 space from APNIC (only using a /28), and are in no way close to being ready to think about going to pure IPv6.
Clients push to us, so we need to have functional DNS as well as link fail-over. We also have multiple public-facing servers offering the same services, so moving to *shudder* NAT or some kind of port proxying isn't an easy option (clients' internal bureaucracies to get firewall ports opened, client configuration, blah blah blah).
So, my question, what are our operational course of action for multi-homing when becoming an AS on the global tubes isn't on the cards?
Cheers
"We're not in any position to even try applying for PI IPv4 space from APNIC (only using a /28)"
Why not?
From APNIC's website:
Criteria for small multihoming delegations
* An organization is eligible if it is currently multihomed with provider-based addresses, or demonstrates a plan to multihome within one month.
* Organizations requesting a delegation under these terms must demonstrate that they are able to use 25% of the requested addresses immediately and 50% within one year.
Very easy criteria to meet.. We had a /27 from our ISP and had no trouble getting a /24 from apnic.
Matt.
_______________________________________________
NZNOG mailing list
NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nzmailto:NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz
http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog
________________________________
The content of this message and any attachments may be privileged, confidential or sensitive. Any unauthorised used is prohibited. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where stated otherwise with appropriate authority. All pricing provided is valid at the time of writing only and due to factors such as the exchange rate, may change without notice. Sales are made subject to our Terms & Conditions, available on our website or on request.
________________________________
