Subject: Re: [registry-discuss] Zone transfers from .nz name servers Date: Thu, 27 May 1999 04:13:40 +0000 From: Andy Linton
Organization: Netlink, Wellington To: registry-discuss(a)2day.com 2Day Chief Enthusiast wrote:
I'd say that ISOCNZ did consult industry and are in the process of doing so. Some weeks ago the ISOCNZ technical committee, John Vorstermans, Mark Davies and Roger De Salis talked to Joe Abley and myself. If they didn't talk with Peter that doesn't mean they didn't talk with industry.
We have a different view on what consultation is.
Just because you aren't included in a discussion, it doesn't mean there hasn't been one.
I have since been seconded onto ISOCNZ council to fill the vacancy left by Peter Mott's resignation and am now on that committee. The tech committee have the task of looking at closing of the zone transfer holes. This is not cast in stone and could be changed if valid reasons can be produced.
David Farrer said a decision had already been made to disallow XFRS. Can we get the story straight please?
Read my posting - I'm asking for reasons why this should be changed and all I'm hearing is whinging about how unreponsive ISCONZ are.
p.s. If you took up my vacancy, you would be on the education and research subcommittee.
Nope! I'm on the commitee that's most appropriate for my background and experience.
-- Mailto:asjl(a)netlink.net.nz Post: Netlink, PO Box 5358, Lambton Quay, Wellington, New Zealand -- --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog