Dean Pemberton wrote:
The truth can only be established AFTER the court case =)
from bitter personal experience, truth has nothing to do with court cases, which are more about buying the best lawyers. I'd be very dubious about altering an archive, you could open yourself to all sorts of actions from others. As the man said.... maybe he should not have done it in the first place..... and let it be a warning to others... R
On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 11:56:29AM +1200, Mark Foster wrote:
Is it defamation when its true? This has always been my question. :P
At 11:48 17/07/2001 +1200, Dean Pemberton wrote:
Yeah - although the archives should be an accurate representation of what went on on this list. If you let people monkey with it then it looses its integrity. You don't see me getting things whipped out of the archives everytime I put my foot in it do you (Oops there goes another one =) )
On the other hand if you don't do it then he could always get some monopoly to fund a defamation action against the people in question.
-.-. --.- Mark Foster - markf(a)intermech.co.nz IT Manager, Intermech Ltd +64-21-499-368 / +64-9-525-2220 http://www.intermech.co.nz
--------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog
-- \_ Roger De Salis Cisco Systems NZ Ltd