19 Feb
2007
19 Feb
'07
5:26 p.m.
Nathan Ward wrote:
Err, ignore the bits/packets bit. It's late, shush.
I'll replace it with: - Did you allow for dynamic IP addresses, or is that not relevant here?
I'm assuming they're unlikely to change over the course of a day. I think the assumption is fairly safe. I've not had time to do any work on seeing how valid this assumption is.