Any indication of them bouncing messages with no SPF at all? Cheers JT From: "Glen Eustace" <geustace(a)godzone.net.nz> To: "Peter Lambrechtsen" <peter(a)crypt.nz> Cc: "NZNOG" <nznog(a)list.waikato.ac.nz> Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2017 1:33:56 PM Subject: Re: [nznog] Xtra and SPF On 8/02/2017, at 1:24 PM, Peter Lambrechtsen < peter(a)crypt.nz > wrote: The xtra.co.nz domain doesn't seem to have a DKIM or SPF record attached to it, in fact there isn't any txt record on the domain. This isn’t a case of an SPF on xtra.co.nz but SPFs from senders that end up with final delivery being an Xtra mailbox. < xxxxxxxxxx(a)xtra.co.nz > (expanded from < admin(a)yyyyyyyyyy.nz >): host mx.xtra.co.nz [210.55.143.33] said: 550 5.7.1 Message rejected due to SPF policy (in reply to end of DATA command) where senders domain has -all on its SPF record. _______________________________________________ NZNOG mailing list NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz https://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog