I second what Mike and Dave say here.

The _seem_ like a good idea, but they are not something you want to deal with at 3am.

Sure you can use angled connectors on the circulators, but it�s unlikely you�ll find active equipment that has angled connectors and most fibre providers will use un-angled connectors. Only the smart ones use angled connectors on on long distance fibre ;)

On 16/01/2014, at 9:22 am, Nathan Ward <nznog@daork.net> wrote:

Does that still happen if you use angled connectors? It shouldn�t..

On 16/01/2014, at 12:09 pm, Dave Mill <davemill@gmail.com> wrote:


On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Mike Jager <mike@mikej.net.nz> wrote:
On 16/01/2014, at 11:16, Sam Russell <sam.h.russell@gmail.com> wrote:

> Does anyone recommend a supplier for fibre circulators, preferably with LC connectors? I'd be keen to hear anyone's experiences/horror stories with them if you're willing to volunteer them.

At first glance, they seem like a nifty idea.

In my experience they end up being a lot more hassle than they�re worth (finding somewhere to locate them in a rack, especially when that rack isn�t yours; optics that launch a little bit too bright or receive a little bit too dim resulting in ports standing up to themselves when the line side of the circulator is disconnected), especially with availability of single fibre optics up to 10Gbps.



I'll 2nd what Mike says here. When they work they work really well. The problem is that when things get slightly strange you can still have a port being up but you then have what you're advertising out being reflected back. When every MAC you send out a port is advertised back at that port then "interesting things happen".

Dave

_______________________________________________
NZNOG mailing list
NZNOG@list.waikato.ac.nz
http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog

_______________________________________________
NZNOG mailing list
NZNOG@list.waikato.ac.nz
http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog

--
Daniel