On Thu, 3 Jul 2003 23:01:16 +1200, -
Sahil said to me, as well as publically on the site that the "auditor's" report would be made available publically on the website. After a number of months I saw him again, and casually asked, whats up with that auditor's report, and he shrugged it off, as if to say "that was a joke". Secondly Sahil obviously did know about it, so shrugging it off as his staff's fault is amusing in the least
I find it hard to understand why there must be more abuse of net4u & co. on this list. Surely there's been enough net4u-bashing over the past few months that we all have made up our minds whether or not to consider them to provide us with Internet access or peering in the future. So why must more and more things be brought forward? All it does is clogs my inbox. So shush. On another note, Whos going to Netforum? A quick survey of Auckland Thursday Night Curry attendees didn't look too promising.. -- Nathan Ward Esphion Ltd.