That's me too out, Is this security or security theater? Just how much damage could a single compromised person do?
If this document is to be trusted it must be�adhered�to in it's strictest sense which does rule out those smokers and coffee addict's, If the people who�implement�the document in day to day operations make exceptions like one for coffee/smokers then it does question what other exceptions are being made.
Of course I�don't�expect anyone to be barred from a trusted position because they like a cup or ten of joe every day but perhaps the document needs to reflect this?
On 11 July 2011 10:07, Richard Hector
<richard@walnut.gen.nz> wrote:
On 10/07/11 18:58, Dean Pemberton wrote:
> NZRS will not consider persons for a position as a trusted individual if
> they have been:
> � � * identified to have a gambling or substance addiction.
That's me out, along with anyone else addicted to caffeine (or
nicotine). How many qualified people left?
Richard