On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Tristram Cheer <
tristramcheer@gmail.com>
wrote:
> If this document is to be trusted it must be�adhered�to in it's
> strictest sense which does rule out those smokers and coffee addict's,
> If the people who�implement�the document in day to day operations make
> exceptions like one for coffee/smokers then it does question what
> other exceptions are being made.
And as soon as we start heading down this path I think we are going in to
dangerous grounds as we are starting to dictate exactly what is acceptable
and what is not.
Is someone who drinks 10 beers each week fine? How about someone who has 30
a week? Or me who plays poker every week? If someone dables in recreational
drugs are they completely out?
Maybe we need to more look at what we're trying to prevent here, and then
create rules that attempt to enforce that.
For example..
Steps are taken to ensure that trusted people:
-Do not have an addiction to a proven dangerous substance -Are generally in
a state that allows them to perform their duties -Are not an easy target for
black-mail or bribery due to life-style choices or past history
Thoughts?
Dave