All, I have a question about the converse side of the issue we have struck... Are there any RSPs out there that are classifying on ingress from us based on DEI? i.e.*IF* we did remove DEI=1, is it going to cause any pain? I guess this would most likely be the guys with ALU kit which are using the DEI bit from us to classify, but I suspect that no one is doing this... As has been mentioned, it’s a global change for us to remove DEI. Given the impact to our customers (you guys) and your customers, we're still investigating the possibility of removing DEI. Which has technical and commercial issues around it. Thanks, Brent -----Original Message----- From: Simon Allard [mailto:Simon.Allard(a)team.orcon.net.nz] Sent: Monday, 13 October 2014 12:06 p.m. To: Nathan Ward; Brent Marquis; Dave Mill; Don Stokes Cc: nznog(a)list.waikato.ac.nz Subject: RE: [nznog] UFB Upload Issues
People should really just use 0x88a8 - those who aren’t, can I ask why not? Is it because you’re trying to tunnel it over a switch that doesn’t support 802.1ad or something? I’m not saying it’s wrong, I’m > interested in understanding the situations in which you might do this.
Some devices just don't support it, even modern kit. We use Pseudowires to transport handovers to central ALU 7750's. The ALU 7750 drops the packets if we use 08x88 on the handovers in the Psuedowire code. Apparently 0x8100 is hardcoded! Hopefully one day they will fix it. This communication, including any attachments, is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not read it - please contact me immediately, destroy it, and do not copy or use any part of this communication or disclose anything about it. Thank you. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mis-transmission or error. Please note that this communication does not designate an information system for the purposes of the Electronic Transactions Act 2002.