Yes, I am doing that without any issues on MX5's with 2x10G : --- JUNOS 12.3R6.6 built 2014-03-13 06:58:30 UTC icore1-w.inet.0: 504782 destinations, 1009366 routes (504749 active, 33 holddown, 0 hidden) Direct: 3 routes, 3 active Local: 2 routes, 2 active OSPF: 47 routes, 47 active BGP: 1009314 routes, 504697 active -----Original Message----- From: nznog-bounces(a)list.waikato.ac.nz [mailto:nznog-bounces(a)list.waikato.ac.nz] On Behalf Of Ewen McNeill Sent: Thursday, 10 July 2014 10:15 a.m. To: nznog Subject: [nznog] Juniper MX with inline-jflow and full tables Is anyone running a Juniper MX-80 type platform (MX5/10/40/80) and using inline-jflow (which runs in the TFEB) on the same router as full IPv4 BGP tables? Either with the current JTAC recommended release (12.3R6.6) or some other software release. I have a client that has been trying this, and found that moving to 12.3R6.6 and being _very_ careful about what goes into the TFEB[0] has made it _better_ than it was with previous software releases. But still not exactly rock solid, run forever. If anyone has experiences they'd be willing to share, either positive or negative, I'd be interested. Either on list or off list. (I'm happy to summarise back to the list if anything useful gets turned up.) Ewen +64-21-916-965 [0] To avoid running out of memory -- inline-jflow seems inclined to use about 1/3rd of the TFEB memory when it is turned on, and of course full v4 tables require a bunch of TFEB memory too. _______________________________________________ NZNOG mailing list NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog