There's been some discussion here about multihoming and IPv6. We decided that we need to be able to multihome and went to APNIC for address space. We filled in the forms in good faith indicating that we intended to have 200 customers within the two year time scale etc. That was in June 2005. Since then we've never had a single customer ask for an allocation. It's fair to say we haven't really been pushing that hard either. For us having this address space from APNIC pushes us into the next tier of membership and costs us an additional US$2500 a year. We have had a very serious discussion here about returning this to APNIC and getting a reduction in our charges. So my question is in part to APNIC and also to members of this group, "If IPv6 is such good thing that we all should be encouraged to use it why does the APNIC pricing model mitigate against it?"