19 Sep
2001
19 Sep
'01
11:53 a.m.
:: Why? It wouldn't be visible to the rest of the world, and :: would provide the :: protection asked for, albeit with a reduction in :: functionality. That would :: even hide the IPNet RFC1918 addresses currently visible to :: the world :-) Actually, it wouldn't provide that much more protection, would it? There'd still be a public IP in front of the NAT, which presumably would send all the crap to your systems (unless of course you had control over the NAT or the RFC 1918 allocations). Yes? -- Juha --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog