Hi All,
Currently ( all? ) the NZIX route servers insert the exchange ASN into
routes that are advertised to the route servers.
��The exchanges that we peer with overseas such as Any2 in LA, Equinix
Sydney and NSW-IX plus the new AKL-IX exchange do not insert the
exchange ASN into advertisements, so all else being equal the paths from
those exchanges are shorter than routes from APE and WIX by one AS hop.
There are other NZ networks like us that peer at APE and/or WIX and also
peer at overseas exchanges and to have optimal traffic flows with them,
we put in one off hacks per network. The least ugly ways of doing this
for us work fine but create per peer config that must be maintained.
Ideally we can put bilateral peering up at APE and WIX so that the extra
AS hop goes away but sometimes bilateral peering is impractical due to
the other networks peering policy.
I can't think of a reason why putting the exchange ASN in the path helps
anyone. Is this just a hangover from the old days? Or is there some
legitimate reason that it should be like this?