The NZNOG NOC list is still useful. The downside of the Peering DB page is that it asks that only peering partners request access.

Sometimes it is useful for a non-peering partner to get the NOC contact details of an organisation.

 

Jonathon Exley | Network Specialist Layer 2

 Chorus | T : +6448964190 | M :+64275148048

    

From: nznog-bounces@list.waikato.ac.nz [mailto:nznog-bounces@list.waikato.ac.nz] On Behalf Of Simon Allard
Sent: Tuesday, 3 March 2015 9:35 a.m.
To: <nznog@list.waikato.ac.nz>
Subject: Re: [nznog] Orcon Helpdesk

 

+1

 

Peering DB is an excellent resource and I am favour of using it over a NZNog created Wiki/Web page.

 

It���s selfservice/easy to edit and displays a lot of useful information.

 

We have 3 entries for the Callplus Group.

 

http://www.peeringdb.com/view.php?asn=4610

http://www.peeringdb.com/view.php?asn=17746 (We will be retiring this AS number soon)

http://www.peeringdb.com/view.php?asn=9790

 

I highly recommend more NZ providers making use of this tool.

 

 

 

Simon Allard // Senior Network Architect 

D: 09 550 2790   M: 020 100 0790   F:  

 

www.callplus.co.nz | www.slingshot.co.nz | www.flip.co.nz | www.orcon.net.nz

 

This message and any attachments contain privileged and confidential information. If you

are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that any use,

dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message is prohibited.

If you have received this message in error please notify the sender immediately via email

and then destroy this message and any attachments.

 

From: nznog-bounces@list.waikato.ac.nz [mailto:nznog-bounces@list.waikato.ac.nz] On Behalf Of Neil Fenemor
Sent: Monday, 2 March 2015 6:57 p.m.
To: Tim Price
Cc: <nznog@list.waikato.ac.nz>
Subject: Re: [nznog] Orcon Helpdesk

 

An alternative or additional list I���d suggest you all join is of course PeeringDB. Those who attended a couple of the talks at NZNOG���15 will know its general value for various parties determining who is peering where, but also how to get in contact with the various peering parties.

 

Orcon themselves do have an active PeeringDB entry, last updated in January 2015.

 

https://www.peeringdb.com/private/participant_view.php?id=6869

 

Cheers,

 

neil

 

On 2/03/2015, at 5:34 pm, Tim Price <tim@initech.co.nz> wrote:

 

Might help if the list curator actually updated the list when asked. Have submitted two updates in the last 12 months and had no response whatsoever. It's hard to maintain the credibility of such a list when it's effectively abandoned. Perhaps it should be converted to a wiki and moderated by the community instead of an individual?

My $0.02,

Tim



On 2/03/2015, at 5:05 pm, Craig Whitmore <lennon@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

Maybe someone from all the ISPs listed on http://www.nznog.org/noc-list
should get them updated (If they are not correct)

I know personally a lot of the information is incorrect now a days

-----Original Message-----
From: nznog-bounces@list.waikato.ac.nz
[mailto:nznog-bounces@list.waikato.ac.nz] On Behalf Of Keith Davidson
Sent: Monday, 2 March 2015 4:40 p.m.
To: nznog@list.waikato.ac.nz
Subject: [nznog] Orcon Helpdesk

Is there anyone from Orcon technical subscribed to this list who could
contact me offlist please?

Cheers

Keith
_______________________________________________
NZNOG mailing list
NZNOG@list.waikato.ac.nz
http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog

_______________________________________________
NZNOG mailing list
NZNOG@list.waikato.ac.nz
http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog

_______________________________________________
NZNOG mailing list
NZNOG@list.waikato.ac.nz
http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog

 

This communication, including any attachments, is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not read it - please contact me immediately, destroy it, and do not copy or use any part of this communication or disclose anything about it. Thank you. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mis-transmission or error. Please note that this communication does not designate an information system for the purposes of the Electronic Transactions Act 2002.