FYI to the ISP community.
In Today’s issue of Commsday International
– July 10 2009, Page 2 and 3 sidebar
IP ADDRESSES ARE NOT PERSONAL OR PRIVATE
A US federal judge has ruled IP addresses do not constitute
personal information, establishing a legal precedent that could radically alter
Internet privacy norms.
Presiding over a class action lawsuit against Microsoft, US
District Court judge Richard Jones defended the company's collection of
customers' IP addresses during software updates as fair and reasonable despite
a user agreement promising not to hoover up identifying data.
“In order for 'personally identifiable information' to
be personally identifiable, it must identify a person. But an IP address
identifies a computer,” Jones wrote in a dismissal.
The ruling underlines the lack of federal guidance on the
issue, with US courts handing out a series of contradictory decisions piecemeal
over the last few years. Just last month a New Jersey court determined surfers
had a reasonable right to assume their IP addresses would be kept private and
barred ISPs from disclosing them to third parties without a subpoena. The New
York Times made headlines three years ago when it proved
“anonymous” IP addresses provided by AOL would be tied to specific
surfers.
--
Skeeve Stevens,
CEO/Technical Director
eintellego Pty
Ltd - The Networking Specialists
skeeve@eintellego.net
/ www.eintellego.net
Phone: 1300 753
383, Fax: (+612) 8572 9954
Cell +61 (0)414
753 383 / skype://skeeve
www.linkedin.com/in/skeeve
; facebook.com/eintellego
--
NOC, NOC, who's
there?
Disclaimer:
Limits of Liability and Disclaimer: This message is for the named person's use only.
It may contain sensitive and private proprietary or legally privileged
information. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute,
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient.
eintellego Pty Ltd and each legal entity in the Tefilah Pty Ltd group of
companies reserve the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its
networks. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised
to state them to be the views of any such entity. Any reference to costs, fee
quotations, contractual transactions and variations to contract terms is
subject to separate confirmation in writing signed by an authorised representative
of eintellego. Whilst all efforts are made to safeguard inbound and outbound
e-mails, we cannot guarantee that attachments are virus-free or compatible with
your systems and do not accept any liability in respect of viruses or computer
problems experienced.