Comments from the community on what form of license might be appropriate?
Comments on leaving the existing ones ARR and making new ones as
something different (CC)?
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Richard Naylor
At 01:48 p.m. 2/12/2014, Nick wrote:
A woefully inadequate search of the archives does not produce an answer to this, so tempting all fate, I submit a possibly list relevant query...
What is the copyright licencing on the r2 recordings of NZNOG? Each page clearly displays their copyright, which is fair and makes sense, but there appears to be no distribution licence (eg Creative Commons?)
The copyright is held by R2 (2011) Ltd and all rights are reserved.
We use that statement whenever a client fails to advise what rights they would like to assert. This is to protect the client's interests despite their ignorance - if that makes sense. We have only 2 clients who (usually) advise what rights to assert and they are usually a form of CC.
On the funny side - even Creative Commons NZ don't advise, even after 7 years of waiting, so we hold the rights on their launch in NZ ! http://www.r2.co.nz/20071027/
_______________________________________________ NZNOG mailing list NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog