On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 02:38:40PM +1200, J S Russell wrote:
On Sun, 8 Apr 2001, Joe Abley wrote:
So, this competitor product also includes a four-port hub, and doesn't require a switch that can supply power over cat5? So you can cascade multiple phones, and you don't need to dedicate an ethernet switch port to every telephone?
Oh please, the Cisco unit doesn't _require_ such a switch, either. It's optional. And you can cascade multiple IP phones, and don't need to dedicate a port to each one. :) You're reaching. :)
Heh :) If you don't phantom power your IP phone, you end up with two cables between the wall and your phone. Which is the same as you need for this unnamed-Canadian-vendor's phone. I just thought it was funny. Bugger the functionality! Price is meaningless! We use fewer cables! The view from the rear of our phone is more pleasing!
The morons! What were they thinking?!
They weren't thinking "Make it look sexy to your average PHB." whereas I'll wager that phrase (or concept, at least) was part of the Cisco product brief. Cisco IP phones are _pretty_.
That's ok then! As long as they look nice! Personally, if I was going to have a phone on my desk, I'd choose the one that gave me bonus hub ports :) Joe --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog