On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Jonathon Exley
Surely the account holder would be considered to be the prefix owner. Is the legislation so tightly worded so that you have to be an IP address owner?
Well that's what lawyers are for, isn't it? :-) The difference between intention and actual wording ... An IPAP allocates IP addresses. A prefix is not an address. The address is computed from various features of my machine, and is not purposefully and audit-ably allocated by a human. http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1994/0143/latest/DLM345634.html#DL... is the Copyright Act that has been amended (this is the most useful version to browse, I think) In 122A we find :- “account holder, in relation to an IPAP, means a person who has an account with the IPAP" “IPAP, or Internet protocol address provider, means a person that operates a business that, other than as an incidental feature of its main business activities,— “(a) offers the transmission, routing, and providing of connections for digital online communications, between or among points specified by a user, of material of the user's choosing; and “(b) allocates IP addresses to its account holders; and “(c) charges its account holders for its services; and “(d) is not primarily operated to cater for transient users" So if my address has not been allocated to me by an IPAP, I don't have an IPAP, and I cannot be an account holder. -jim, with fingers crossed, but still on an IPv4 upstream.