Here's an example of an Xtra bounces which looks like soft fail but which includes a hard fail. So I'm assuming that a hard fail anywhere takes precedence, does anybody know the rules, I could not find any references. sailthru.com. 10800 IN TXT "v=spf1 include:aspmx.sailthru.com include:_spf.google.com include:_netblocks.zdsys.com ~all" aspmx.sailthru.com. 900 IN TXT "v=spf1 ip4:64.34.47.128/27 ip4:64.34.57.192/26 ip4:65.39.215.0/24 ip4:192.64.236.0/24 ip4:192.64.237.0/24 ip4:173.228.155.0/24 ip4:192.64.238.0/24 ip4:204.153.121.0/24 -all" _netblocks.zdsys.com. 54000 IN TXT "v=spf1 ip4:192.161.144.0/20 ip4:185.12.80.0/22 ip4:96.46.150.192/27 ip4:174.137.46.0/24 ip4:188.172.128.0/20 ip4:216.198.0.0/18 ~all" _spf.google.com. 55 IN TXT "v=spf1 include:_netblocks.google.com include:_netblocks2.google.com include:_netblocks3.google.com ~all" On 21/02/17 14:17, Paul Willard wrote:
I'm getting mail bouncing with ~all spf record soft fail .. and xtra (actually smx) are rejecting.
Could be that they don't like me :)
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 3:57 PM, Brian E Carpenter
mailto:brian.e.carpenter(a)gmail.com> wrote: On 08/02/2017 15:34, Mark Foster wrote: ... > Someone mentioned mailing lists; decent ones rewrite the envelope and > don't break SPF.
Or rather, are not broken by SPF. Unfortunately, the same is not true of DMARC. There's still no good solution for lists or forwarders that are broken by DMARC. Glen, I fear that DMARC problems are in your future.
Brian
_______________________________________________ NZNOG mailing list NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz mailto:NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz https://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog https://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog
_______________________________________________ NZNOG mailing list NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz https://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog
-- Jean-Francois Pirus | Technical Manager francois(a)clearfield.com | Mob +64 21 640 779 | DDI +64 9 282 3401 Clearfield Software Ltd | Ph +64 9 358 2081 | www.clearfield.com