Dean Pemberton wrote:
I'm in favour of the standard Randy Bush reply...
*walks to the mic and starts talking in a slow soft voice which never stays that way for long* "Randy Bush IIJ. We have a process for this. We do this today. It has been working for us for years. GET OVER IT!!"
Dean
On 2/03/11 6:49 AM, Andy Linton wrote:
I think that we should be very clear in any statements that we make that our view is that the IETF is the arbiter of standards for the Internet and that while we welcome any input that the ITU has to make to that standards process we would be very unhappy to see any steps to see competing standards emerge. But we've seen this before. The most recent previous case I can think of is IETF TRILL vs. ITU 802.1aq. As with MPLS, it's not obvious that these are standards for the Internet as opposed to standards for something else.
- Donald Neal -- Donald Neal |"Maybe your mail is being rejected as spam," | she suggested. "Send us copies of all High Performance Computing | messages you didn't receive including The University of Waikato | their IP addresses." - Robert X. Cringely